Dataset of the adoption of digital tools for research sharing among academics in African Varsities during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
Клики: 166
ID: 275701
2022
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Вовлечённость читателей
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
166 просмотры
29 читатели
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #53 of 157 articles by views in F1000Research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 157 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Аннотация
This dataset was collected from a total of 1,977 university lecturers across 24 African countries, that were purposively targeted due to their level of exposure to scholarly publications. The dataset was collected through an online survey that was sent to respondents through email, WhatsApp, and the Association of African Universities Telegram group. The questionnaire was designed by the researchers and validated by five experts for face and content validity. The demographic information of the data was analysed and the softcopy of the data uploaded to the Mendeley database for easy retrieval after deidentification (see Data Availability statement). The associated questionnaire can be found in the extended data. In Africa, this appears to be the broadest dataset associated with academics' perception of utilizing digital platforms for research sharing. This implies that scholars can use this dataset to quantitatively analyse the extent to which different digital tools are being utilized for research communication. Considering the current restrictions on in-person social gatherings due to COVID-19, researchers working on related studies may readily utilize this set of data, saving time and cost. A comprehensive but non-exhaustive number of 20 digital tools were assessed based on academics' awareness and current engagement with them, and the challenges they have faced using them. This offers a wide range of areas for studies to be anchored. Furthermore, researchers interested in specific digital tools can also evaluate the extent to which academic staff in African universities are aware of and willing to utilize them for research dissemination. This data will enable scholars and researchers in Africa and beyond to understand the extent to which academics in varsities are willing to adopt digital repositories for research sharing in the context of Africa.
| Ссылочный ключ |
owan2022datasetofthef1000research
Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании
SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Авторы | Owan, Valentine Joseph;Uzoamaka Duruamaku-Dim, Jennifer;Nonyelum Odigwe, Francisca;Owan, Mercy Valentine; |
| Журнал | F1000Research |
| Год | 2022 |
| DOI |
10.12688/f1000research.54245.3
|
| URL | |
| Ключевые слова |
Цитирования
Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org
Комментарии
Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.