Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Procedure to Determine Antioxidant Capacity of Rapeseed Cultivars - Food Analytical Methods

Clicks: 333
ID: 274402
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 7 articles by views in food analytical methods

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was applied to extract total antioxidants from two rapeseed varieties. The antioxidant capacity of spring and winter rapeseed cultivars was determined by two different analytical methods: 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Effects of three independent variables, sonication time (t), volume of methanol-to-rapeseed weight ratio (V/m), and concentration of methanol (c) on the antioxidant capacity of rapeseed varieties, were studied by response surface methodology (RSM). Box–Behnken design (BBD) was used to obtain the optimal conditions of the UAE. The optimal UAE conditions were evaluated with an extraction time of 13.8 min, a solvent-to-material ratio of 26.2 mL/g and a solvent concentration of 50.3 % for antioxidant capacity of spring rapeseed cultivar (ABTS = 62.7 mmol Trolox equivalent (TE)/100 g, DPPH = 38.3 mmol TE/100 g), whereas the predicted optimum t = 13.3 min, V/m = 29.5 mL/g, and c = 38.3 % resulted in ABTS = 62.0 mmol TE/100 g, DPPH = 48.6 mmol TE/100 g for a winter rapeseed cultivar. Results of ABTS and DPPH determinations correlate with the predicted values (R 2 = 0.9435 and 0.9796 for the spring rapeseed variety and 0.9952, 0.9252 for the winter rapeseed variety).
Reference Key
aleksandra2014foodoptimization Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Szydłowska-Czerniak, Aleksandra;Tułodziecka, Agnieszka;Szydłowska-Czerniak, Aleksandra;Tułodziecka, Agnieszka;
Journal food analytical methods
Year 2014
DOI
doi:10.1007/s12161-014-9950-3
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.