Inclusive η′ production from the Υ(1S)

Clicks: 54
ID: 273757
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #146 of 151 articles by views in physical review d

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 151 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Using the CLEO II detector at CESR, we measure the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ energy spectra in $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S)$ decays that we compare with models of the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}{g}^{*}g$ form factor. This form factor, especially at large ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ energies, may provide an explanation of the large rate for $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{B}{X}_{s}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}.$ Our data do not support a large anomalous coupling at higher ${q}^{2}$ and thus the large ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ rate remains a mystery, possibly requiring a non-standard-model explanation.
Reference Key
2003physicalinclusive Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal physical review d
Year 2003
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.052003
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.