Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus

Clicks: 377
ID: 271893
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #80 of 183 articles by views in The New England journal of medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 183 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Recommendations for universal screening were rapidly adopted. Improved management of preterm deliveries and improved collection, processing, and reporting of culture results may prevent additional cases of early-onset group B streptococcal disease.
Reference Key
mk2009theevaluation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Van Dyke MK;Phares CR;Lynfield R;Thomas AR;Arnold KE;Craig AS;Mohle-Boetani J;Gershman K;Schaffner W;Petit S;Zansky SM;Morin CA;Spina NL;Wymore K;Harrison LH;Shutt KA;Bareta J;Bulens SN;Zell ER;Schuchat A;Schrag SJ;;
Journal The New England journal of medicine
Year 2009
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.