Sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Clicks: 346
ID: 271587
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #126 of 567 articles by views in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 567 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We enrolled 91 consecutive inpatients with COVID-19 at 6 hospitals in Toronto, Canada, and tested 1 nasopharyngeal swab/saliva sample pair from each patient using real-time RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Sensitivity was 89% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 72% for saliva (P …
Reference Key
aj2021clinicalsensitivity Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jamal AJ;Mozafarihashjin M;Coomes E;Powis J;Li AX;Paterson A;Anceva-Sami S;Barati S;Crowl G;Faheem A;Farooqi L;Khan S;Prost K;Poutanen S;Taylor M;Yip L;Zhong XZ;McGeer AJ;Mubareka S; ;;
Journal Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.