Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer

Clicks: 203
ID: 271464
2003
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #15 of 16 articles by views in surgical endoscopy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Background: After confirming a favorable outcome of laparoscopic surgery for early colorectal cancer, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with T2 or T3 colorectal cancer were randomized to undergo laparoscopic (n = 29) or open (n = 30) colectomy. Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 6–34 months). Results: Operative time was longer (p
Reference Key
kitajima2003surgicalrandomized Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors H. Hasegawa,Y. Kabeshima,M. Watanabe,S. Yamamoto,M. Kitajima;H. Hasegawa;Y. Kabeshima;M. Watanabe;S. Yamamoto;M. Kitajima;
Journal surgical endoscopy
Year 2003
DOI
10.1007/s00464-002-8516-4
URL
https://sciprofiles.com/publication/view/c7577180282c2a133d3f163ae84f75b6
Keywords
randomized controlled trial laparoscopic surgery open colectomy advanced colorectal cancer laparoscopic and open

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.