Scientific writing: a randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction
Clicks: 334
ID: 269207
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.2
/100
24 views
24 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Our protocol for on-line scientific writing instruction is better than standard face-to-face instruction in terms of writing quality and student satisfaction. Future studies should evaluate the protocol efficacy in larger longitudinal cohorts involving participants from different languages.
| Reference Key |
a2009bmcscientific
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Phadtare A;Bahmani A;Shah A;Pietrobon R;; |
| Journal | BMC medical education |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
adult
female
male
N.I.H.
Extramural
young adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trial
United States
internet*
brazil
teaching / methods*
health personnel
science*
pmid:19473511
pmc2701428
doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-27
amruta phadtare
anu bahmani
ricardo pietrobon
writing*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.