Predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated COVID-19 patients: two methods are better than one
Clicks: 157
ID: 268645
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
157 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #61 of 131 articles by views in annals of intensive care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 131 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
preau2021annalspredicting
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Morgan Caplan, Michael Howsam, Raphael Favory, Sebastien Preau;Morgan Caplan;Michael Howsam;Raphael Favory;Sebastien Preau; |
| Journal | annals of intensive care |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
10.1186/s13613-021-00826-4
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.