Search for correlation between GRB’s detected by BeppoSAX and gravitational wave detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS
Clicks: 237
ID: 267929
2002
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
237 views
57 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #63 of 151 articles by views in physical review d
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 151 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Data obtained during five months of 2001 with the gravitational wave (GW) detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS, operating with a bandwidth of a few Hz at frequencies near 900 Hz, were studied in correlation with the gamma ray burst data (GRB) obtained with the BeppoSAX satellite. During this period BeppoSAX was the only GRB satellite in operation, while EXPLORER and NAUTILUS were the only GW detectors in operation. No correlation between the GW data and the GRB bursts was found. The analysis, performed over 47 GRB’s, excludes the presence of signals of amplitude h>~6.5×10−19, with 95% probability, if we allow a time delay between GW bursts and GRB within ±5s, and h>~1.2×10−18, if the time delay is within ±400s. The result is also provided in the form of scaled likelihood for unbiased interpretation and easier use for further analysis.
| Reference Key |
visco2002physicalsearch
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | P. Astone,M. Bassan,P. Bonifazi,P. Carelli,G. Castellano,Eugenio Coccia,C. Cosmelli,G. D’Agostini,S. D’Antonio,V. Fafone,G. Federici,Filippo Frontera,C. Guidorzi,A. Marini,Y. Minenkov,I. Modena,Giuseppina Modestino,Arturo Moleti,E. Montanari,G. V. Pallottino,G. Pizzella,Lina Quintieri,A. Rocchi,F. Ronga,R. Terenzi,Guido Torrioli,Massimo Visco;P. Astone;M. Bassan;P. Bonifazi;P. Carelli;G. Castellano;Eugenio Coccia;C. Cosmelli;G. D’Agostini;S. D’Antonio;V. Fafone;G. Federici;Filippo Frontera;C. Guidorzi;A. Marini;Y. Minenkov;I. Modena;Giuseppina Modestino;Arturo Moleti;E. Montanari;G. V. Pallottino;G. Pizzella;Lina Quintieri;A. Rocchi;F. Ronga;R. Terenzi;Guido Torrioli;Massimo Visco; |
| Journal | physical review d |
| Year | 2002 |
| DOI |
10.1103/physrevd.66.102002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.