Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation—an experts’ opinion paper

Clicks: 109
ID: 267366
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #93 of 131 articles by views in annals of intensive care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 131 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Despite a large body of evidence, the implementation of guidelines on hemodynamic optimization and goal-directed therapy remains limited in daily routine practice. To facilitate/accelerate this implementation, a panel of experts in the field proposes ...
Reference Key
longrois2021annalsperioperative Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jean-Luc Fellahi, Emmanuel Futier, Camille Vaisse, Olivier Collange, Olivier Huet, Jerôme Loriau, Etienne Gayat, Benoit Tavernier, Matthieu Biais, Karim Asehnoune, Bernard Cholley, Dan Longrois;Jean-Luc Fellahi;Emmanuel Futier;Camille Vaisse;Olivier Collange;Olivier Huet;Jerôme Loriau;Etienne Gayat;Benoit Tavernier;Matthieu Biais;Karim Asehnoune;Bernard Cholley;Dan Longrois;
Journal annals of intensive care
Year 2021
DOI
10.1186/s13613-021-00845-1
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.