Withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment
Clicks: 188
ID: 266578
1970
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.7
/100
19 views
19 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
There has been considerable criticism recently over the use of end-of-life pathways and do-not-resuscitate orders with vulnerable, incapable patients, often without discussion. This criticism has led to press and judicial scrutiny of the lawfulness of decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustainin …
| Reference Key |
r1970britishwithdrawing
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Griffith R;; |
| Journal | british journal of nursing (mark allen publishing) |
| Year | 1970 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
Euthanasia
passive
united kingdom
pmid:23132007
doi:10.12968/bjon.2012.21.20.1234
richard griffith
resuscitation orders
terminal care
withholding treatment / legislation & jurisprudence*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.