Science 2.0
Clicks: 270
ID: 265665
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
230 views
29 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on. Proponents say these "open access" practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore mo …
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (45 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
mm2008scientificscience
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Waldrop MM;; |
| Journal | scientific american |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
research
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
publishing
information dissemination
internet / trends*
pmid:18444327
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68
m mitchell waldrop
cooperative behavior
science / trends*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.