The value of contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography in differentiating hypoehoic lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate.

Clicks: 256
ID: 263749
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #15 of 26 articles by views in European journal of radiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To characterize the hypoechoic prostate nodules in the peripheral zone by means of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) and contrast enhanced PDUS (CE-PDUS).Thirty-two patients with dijital rectal examination findings suspicious for malignancy and/or a serum PSA level higher than 4 ng/dl, and who had hypoechoic nodules on transrectal ultrasonography were enrolled in this prospective study. Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) images before and after sonocontrast (Levovist) injection were photographed for further evaluation. All patients were also evaluated by a systematic and nodule targeted biopsy approach. The photographs were re-evaluated by two radiologists for the presence and type of vascularity. The type of vascularity was categorized as peripheral, central, mixed and penetrating. The latter two were accepted as representatives of malignancy. The results of PDUS and CE-PDUS were compared to each other and to the pathological results.There was a high level of interobserver agreement (Kappa: 0.80-0.95). Nineteen patients, but only 14 nodules were malignant on pathological examination. Sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive values for PDUS were 57, 50, 47, and 60%, respectively. On CE-PDUS, the sensitivity increased (93%) in expense of specifity (17%). The positive and negative predictive values were 46 and 75%, respectively. There was no significant difference between PDUS and CE-PDUS.This study revealed that both benign and malignant nodules might be hypervascular and show malignant type of vascularity on PDUS. Contrary to some recent reports, we can conclude that the CE-PDUS does not provide a considerable aid to the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma on morphological basis due to its very low specificity despite its relatively higher sensitivity.
Reference Key
karaman2005theeuropean Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Karaman, Can Zafer;Unsal, Alparslan;Akdilli, Alev;Taşkin, Füsun;Erol, Haluk;
Journal European journal of radiology
Year 2005
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.