on the use and abuse of philosophy for psychiatry (and on the use of history)
Clicks: 128
ID: 259257
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
128 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #22 of 27 articles by views in journal of environmental health science & engineering
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
It looks very much
like philosophy is going to
save psychiatry or at least to
rescue it from the quick sands
of biological reductionism, in
which it has been muddling for
decades. Through a series of
historical cases (Roland Kuhn,
Viktor Frankl, Hemmo Müller‐
Suur) this paper aims at
showing that this situation is
not new and that it would be
naïve to take the salvific
value of philosophy for
granted.
| Reference Key |
samuel2015s&f_scienzaefilosofia.iton
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Thoma, Samuel |
| Journal | journal of environmental health science & engineering |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.