classification for chinese libraries (ccl) : histories, accomplishments, problems and its comparisons

Clicks: 7
ID: 257514
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #56 of 122 articles by views in toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 122 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
China has a long history in library classifications, although modern classifications did not emerge until one hundred years ago when the Western classifications were introduced into the country. The Classification for Chinese Libraries (CCL) was developed after years of collective work. The purposes of this article are to review the ancient history and modern efforts in developing Chinese library classifications, examine the organizations, accomplishments and problems of the CCL especially in the areas of philosophy and social sciences, and compare the CCL with the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) in terms of their structures.
Reference Key
zhang2003journalclassification Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Wenxian Zhang
Journal toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology
Year 2003
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.