para romper con la asimetrÍa en la comunicaciÓn de la ciencia
Clicks: 70
ID: 256572
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
20.7
/100
70 views
7 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #25 of 41 articles by views in urologia
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
"All scientific news is good news," would appear to be the motto of many people devoted to science communication. The reason for this is that the conceptual framework for such activity remains a 19th Century amalgam of scientific and human progress, and therefore any new "discovery," technological innovation, or theory is seen as progress, and therefore intrinsically
positive. It is also why, when there is a new item that fails to reflect this ideal, it is taken as an anomaly, a deviation from what scientific endeavor ought to be, which his attributed to external causes. How can we break with this asymmetry? How are we to account for both events based on similar causes? How do we take a symmetrical approach to them? This article analyzes how the relationship between scientific and technological development and social progress and the role of science communication in their convergence was constructed. We then outline the elements that may intervene in the construction of a symmetrical approach to science communication, specifically with reference to a case that recently arouse heated controversy in the media. The conclusion is that the figure of the science communicator
may be somewhat constrained in carrying out this task symmetrically, which in turn leads us to propose the creation of the profession of critic of science.
| Reference Key |
trueba2010ensaiopara
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;César Carrillo Trueba |
| Journal | urologia |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.