benefits of motion in animated storybooks for children’s visual attention and story comprehension. an eye-tracking study.

Clicks: 187
ID: 256339
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The present study provides experimental evidence regarding 4-6-year-old children’s visual processing of animated versus static illustrations in storybooks. 39 participants listened to an animated and a static book, both three times, while eye movements were registered with an eye-tracker. Outcomes corroborate the hypothesis that specifically motion is what attracts children’s attention while looking at illustrations. It is proposed that animated illustrations that are well matched to the text of the story guide children to those parts of the illustration that are important for understanding the story. This may explain why animated books resulted in better comprehension than static books.
Reference Key
takacs2016frontiersbenefits Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Zsofia Katalin Takacs;Adriana G. Bus
Journal accounts of chemical research
Year 2016
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01591
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.