achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

Clicks: 121
ID: 256333
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #17 of 19 articles by views in social cognitive and affective neuroscience

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Reproducibility and reusability of research results is an important concern in scientific communication and science policy. A foundational element of reproducibility and reusability is the open and persistently available presentation of research data. However, many common approaches for primary data publication in use today do not achieve sufficient long-term robustness, openness, accessibility or uniformity. Nor do they permit comprehensive exploitation by modern Web technologies. This has led to several authoritative studies recommending uniform direct citation of data archived in persistent repositories. Data are to be considered as first-class scholarly objects, and treated similarly in many ways to cited and archived scientific and scholarly literature. Here we briefly review the most current and widely agreed set of principle-based recommendations for scholarly data citation, the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP). We then present a framework for operationalizing the JDDCP; and a set of initial recommendations on identifier schemes, identifier resolution behavior, required metadata elements, and best practices for realizing programmatic machine actionability of cited data. The main target audience for the common implementation guidelines in this article consists of publishers, scholarly organizations, and persistent data repositories, including technical staff members in these organizations. But ordinary researchers can also benefit from these recommendations. The guidance provided here is intended to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data, in support of significantly improved verification, validation, reproducibility and re-use of scholarly/scientific data.
Reference Key
starr2015peerjachieving Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Joan Starr;Eleni Castro;Mercè Crosas;Michel Dumontier;Robert R. Downs;Ruth Duerr;Laurel L. Haak;Melissa Haendel;Ivan Herman;Simon Hodson;Joe Hourclé;John Ernest Kratz;Jennifer Lin;Lars Holm Nielsen;Amy Nurnberger;Stefan Proell;Andreas Rauber;Simone Sacchi;Arthur Smith;Mike Taylor;Tim Clark
Journal social cognitive and affective neuroscience
Year 2015
DOI
10.7717/peerj-cs.1
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.