a school garden in biotechnical education
Clicks: 245
ID: 255931
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
245 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #40 of 117 articles by views in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study was conducted on a sample of 360 students of biotechnical
education aged 15 to 18 with the aim of testing the effectiveness of
experiential instruction in a school garden in comparison with traditional
instruction in a classroom. The results show that experiential instruction
yielded significantly better achievement scores than traditional teaching.
The experiential instruction group scored higher in both cognitive domains
included in the test, i.e. knowing and applying. Students’ knowledge in a
post-test was influenced by gender, grade and the educational program that
students were enrolled in.
| Reference Key |
m.2014archivesa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Pogačnik M.;Žnidarčič D.;Strgar Jelka |
| Journal | gastrointestinal endoscopy |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/ABS1401393P
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.