a school garden in biotechnical education
Klik: 268
ID: 255931
2014
Metrik Kualitas & Kinerja Artikel
Kualitas Keseluruhan
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Keterlibatan Pembaca
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
268 tampilan
63 pembaca
Penilaian Kualitas AI
Belum dianalisis
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #33 of 117 articles by views in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstrak
This study was conducted on a sample of 360 students of biotechnical
education aged 15 to 18 with the aim of testing the effectiveness of
experiential instruction in a school garden in comparison with traditional
instruction in a classroom. The results show that experiential instruction
yielded significantly better achievement scores than traditional teaching.
The experiential instruction group scored higher in both cognitive domains
included in the test, i.e. knowing and applying. Students’ knowledge in a
post-test was influenced by gender, grade and the educational program that
students were enrolled in.
| Kunci Referensi |
m.2014archivesa
Gunakan kunci ini untuk mengutip otomatis dalam naskah saat menggunakan
SciMatic Manuscript Manager atau Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Penulis | ;Pogačnik M.;Žnidarčič D.;Strgar Jelka |
| Jurnal | gastrointestinal endoscopy |
| Tahun | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/ABS1401393P
|
| URL | |
| Kata Kunci |
Sitasi
Tidak ada sitasi yang ditemukan. Untuk menambahkan sitasi, hubungi admin di info@scimatic.org
Komentar
Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama berkomentar pada artikel ini.