examination of pre-service teachers misconceptions in measurement and evaluation concepts
Clicks: 155
ID: 255591
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
155 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #13 of 30 articles by views in bmc international health and human rights
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine pre-service teachers’ common misconceptions in measurement and evaluation concepts. In accordance with this objective a two-tier multiple choice test which consists of 17 questions has been developed. The validity of the test was determined by judgements of assessment experts and reliability was examined by test-retest method. The present study was conducted in 2014-2015 academic year with total number 328 pre-service teachers of Hacettepe, Kırıkkale and Akdeniz Universities, Faculty of Education. The obtained data have been analyzed with frequency and percentage. To interpret the findings, the criteria for common misconceptions for each questions was accepted as the 10 percent or more of the options which were chosen among 16 binary alternatives by the group. Thirty common misconceptions were determined among the 17 questions. The most common misconceptions were about the “difficulty index” and “normal distribution” conceptions.
| Reference Key |
aydoan2017journalexamination
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Sibel AYDOĞAN;Selahattin GELBAL |
| Journal | bmc international health and human rights |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.21031/epod.355275
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.