giant ureteral stone – case report

Clicks: 123
ID: 254495
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #63 of 78 articles by views in New England Journal of Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Conventional surgery for the treatment of ureteral calculi isnowadays restricted to a few special situations or when minimallyinvasive treatment fails. Giant uteretal calculus is arare disease. The classical treatment is ureterolithotomy withlarge ureteral incision. We present a case of a 16-year-oldmale who presented a ureteral stone measuring 11 cm. He wassubmitted to open surgery, with lithotripsy and an incision of 2 cmon the mid point of the calculus, which led to a less aggressiveintervention on the ureter to remove the stone. There were nopostoperative complications and the patient was discharged fromhospital after 4 days. We speculate that this technical procedurecould be performed by means of laparoscopy and be even lessaggressive.
Reference Key
neto2006einsteingiant Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Antônio Corrêa Lopes Neto;João Paulo Zambon;Milton Borrelli Junior;Mario Henrique Elias de Mattos;Eric Roger Wroclawski
Journal New England Journal of Medicine
Year 2006
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.