a sampling of canadian practice in managing nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding before recent guideline publication: is there room for improvement?

Clicks: 83
ID: 253167
2005
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #198 of 250 articles by views in indian journal of pharmacology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 250 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few recent published consensus guidelines regarding nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In 2003, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology sponsored a set of 20 recommendations. AIM: To compare current Canadian clinical practice patterns with these most recent guidelines.
Reference Key
bensoussan2005canadiana Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Karen Bensoussan;Carlo A Fallone;Alan N Barkun;Myriam Martel
Journal indian journal of pharmacology
Year 2005
DOI
10.1155/2005/198387
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/198387
Keywords
Gastroenterology diseases of the digestive system

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.