participación de los hombres en la planificación familiar
Clicks: 166
ID: 252825
2001
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
166 views
27 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #54 of 75 articles by views in chemical biology and drug design
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Se realizó un estudio descriptivo con el objetivo de identificar las causas de la baja participación de los hombres en la consulta de planificación familiar (PF). La muestra fue de 300 hombres, 100 parejas de mujeres asistentes a la consulta de PF y 200 seleccionados al azar. Se les aplicó un cuestionario conformado por 16 preguntas, y se encontró que solo 3,6 % participó en la consulta de planificación familiar, el 63,6 % fue con el objetivo de acompañar a sus parejas. El condón fue el método anticonceptivo más utilizado por la muestra (47,3 %), predominando su uso entre jóvenes de 20 a 24 años (59,5 %). El 48,6 % tiene conocimiento regular sobre PF y en 1 de cada 4 hombres el nivel de conocimientos es malo, y predominó la comunicación deficiente de parejas (64 %). Se concluye que los hombres acuden poco a la consulta de PF por tener pobre motivación para ello, desconocimiento sobre aspectos relacionados con la PF y comunicación deficiente con su pareja.
A descriptive study was conducted aimed at identifying the causes of the low participation of men in the family planning (FP) consultation. The sample was composed of 300 men, 100 that accompanied their partners to the consultation and 200 that were randomly selected. A questionnaire with 16 questions was applied and it was found that only 3.6 % participated in the family planning consultation and that 63.6 % went just as companions. The condom was the most used contraceptive method according to the sample (47.3 %). Its use prevailed among young men aged 20-24 (59.5 %). 48.6 % men had fair knowledge about family planning, whereas 1 out of 4 had poor knowledge. It was observed a defficient communication between partners (64 %). It was concluded that men do not go to the consultation frequently due to their little motivation, to the lack of knowledge on aspects related to family planning and to a defficient communication with their partners
A descriptive study was conducted aimed at identifying the causes of the low participation of men in the family planning (FP) consultation. The sample was composed of 300 men, 100 that accompanied their partners to the consultation and 200 that were randomly selected. A questionnaire with 16 questions was applied and it was found that only 3.6 % participated in the family planning consultation and that 63.6 % went just as companions. The condom was the most used contraceptive method according to the sample (47.3 %). Its use prevailed among young men aged 20-24 (59.5 %). 48.6 % men had fair knowledge about family planning, whereas 1 out of 4 had poor knowledge. It was observed a defficient communication between partners (64 %). It was concluded that men do not go to the consultation frequently due to their little motivation, to the lack of knowledge on aspects related to family planning and to a defficient communication with their partners
| Reference Key |
labrada2001participacin
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Marianela de la C Prendes Labrada;Zuraika Aparicio Arias;Wilfredo Guibert Reyes;Orlando Lescay Megret |
| Journal | chemical biology and drug design |
| Year | 2001 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.