settlement predictions of footings on sands using probabilistic analysis
Clicks: 189
ID: 252098
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
189 views
26 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #40 of 40 articles by views in journal of neurotrauma
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The design of footings on sands is often controlled by settlement rather than bearing capacity. Therefore, settlement predictions are essential in the design of shallow foundations. However, predicted settlements of footings are highly dependent on the chosen elastic modulus and the used method. This paper presents the use of probabilistic analysis to evaluate the variability of predicted settlements of footings on sands, focusing on the load curve (predicted settlements) characterization. Three methodologies, the first- and second-order second-moment (FOSM and SOSM), and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), for calculating the mean and variance of the estimated settlements through Schmertmann (1970)'s equation, are presented and discussed. The soil beneath the footing is treated as an uncorrelated layered material, so the total settlement and variance are found by adding up the increments of the layers. The deformability modulus (ESi) is considered as the only independent random variable. As an example of application, a hypothetical case of a typical subsoil in the state of Espirito Santo, southeast of Brazil, is evaluated. The results indicate that there is a significant similarity between the SOSM and MCS methods, while the FOSM method underestimates the results due to the non-consideration of the high-order terms in Taylor's series. The contribution of the knowledge of the uncertainties in settlement prediction can provide a safer design.
| Reference Key |
bungenstab2016journalsettlement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Felipe Carvalho Bungenstab;Kátia Vanessa Bicalho |
| Journal | journal of neurotrauma |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.08.009
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.