la tutela de los trabajadores especialmente sensibles a los riesgos en el desarrollo de su relación laboral
Clicks: 124
ID: 251730
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
124 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #36 of 43 articles by views in science and engineering ethics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
La LPRL otorga protección genérica a todo trabajador y diferenciada a determinados colectivos, entre ellos los denominados especialmente sensibles. Así, su art. 25 prohíbe adscribir al sujeto a tareas cuyo desarrollo implique peligro para él o terceros debido a las características personales, estado biológico, discapacidad u otra situación transitoria durante la cual no responda a las exigencias psicofísicas del puesto; contexto idóneo para convertir a la vigilancia de la salud en instrumento de selección de mano de obra y en amenaza para intimidad e igualdad. También impone al empresario una atención particularizada, y adoptar medidas preventivas y de protección adecuadas, respecto a empleados cuya sensibilidad surja o sea conocida vigente la relación; el principio de adaptación del trabajo al trabajador exige alejarle del riesgo, forzando, incluso, la movilidad funcional o geográfica (no condicionadas al origen profesional de una eventual dolencia), o impidiéndola, y convirtiendo a la extinción en ultima ratio. El despido por omisión de datos clínicos o personales será nulo (art. 18 CE); únicamente improcedente si la causa de la resolución es la falta de capacidad por enfermedad, pues la jurisprudencia no lo estima discriminatorio.
The LPRL provides, with a generic protection for all employees, a specific one, aimed at certain groups; one of this, the "especially sensitive workers". In such a way that its article 25 bans ask the employee, in view of his state of health or capacity, to carry on potentially dangerous activities, for him o for other people. In this context, the surveillance of workers' health condition is a good selection test for the labour and a threat for private life and equality. Also imposes to the entrepreneur a single attention and the obligation of adopt the right preventive and protective measures as regards the employees whose sensitive arises or is known current the labour relation. The principie of adapt the work to the worker requires to move him away from the risk, even forcing the mobility between functions or places (or, even, banning the transfer to a workplace dangerous for him) and turning the dismissal into the last option. The dismissal with origin in the omission of clinical or personal information will be annulled (art. 18 CE); only unfair dismissal if the reason is the lack of capacity because illness, due to according to jurisprudence, it is not discriminatory.
The LPRL provides, with a generic protection for all employees, a specific one, aimed at certain groups; one of this, the "especially sensitive workers". In such a way that its article 25 bans ask the employee, in view of his state of health or capacity, to carry on potentially dangerous activities, for him o for other people. In this context, the surveillance of workers' health condition is a good selection test for the labour and a threat for private life and equality. Also imposes to the entrepreneur a single attention and the obligation of adopt the right preventive and protective measures as regards the employees whose sensitive arises or is known current the labour relation. The principie of adapt the work to the worker requires to move him away from the risk, even forcing the mobility between functions or places (or, even, banning the transfer to a workplace dangerous for him) and turning the dismissal into the last option. The dismissal with origin in the omission of clinical or personal information will be annulled (art. 18 CE); only unfair dismissal if the reason is the lack of capacity because illness, due to according to jurisprudence, it is not discriminatory.
| Reference Key |
viforcos2008pecunia:la
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Beatriz Agra Viforcos |
| Journal | science and engineering ethics |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.18002/pec.v0i7.686
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.