comparação entre os métodos de fumigação-extração e fumigação-incubação para determinação do carbono da biomassa microbiana em um latossolo comparison of the methods fumigation-extraction and fumigation-incubation in the evaluation of microbial biomass c in a dark red oxisol
Clicks: 368
ID: 251415
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
78.7
/100
368 views
246 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #16 of 201 articles by views in Revista de saude publica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Um número crescente de trabalhos, inclusive no Brasil, vem sugerindo a avaliação do C da biomassa microbiana (CBM) como um bioindicador da qualidade dos solos. A maioria dos estudos emprega dois métodos: de fumigação-incubação (FI), pioneiro, em que o CBM é estimado pela diferença entre as quantidades de CO2 liberadas durante a incubação (10 dias) pelo solo fumigado e pelo solo não-fumigado, enquanto no de fumigação-extração (FE) essa determinação é feita a partir da extração e quantificação do C das amostras fumigadas e não-fumigadas após 24 h. A correlação entre os dois métodos, porém, foi realizada em apenas três agroecossistemas brasileiros: na Amazônia, nos Cerrados e em três solos do Rio de Janeiro. Neste trabalho, os métodos FE e FI foram comparados em um Latossolo Vermelho distroférrico eutrófico típico do norte do Paraná. As avaliações foram feitas em amostras de solo de um ensaio realizado por 12 anos em Londrina, com seis tratamentos, incluindo três sistemas de manejo do solo (sistema plantio direto, PD; sistema preparo convencional com aração e gradagem, PC; e PD com uso de cruzador a cada três anos, Cr) e dois sistemas de manejo de culturas em sucessão ou rotação. Foram realizadas coletas de solo, da camada de 0-10 cm, em quatro fases do sistema de produção: pós-colheita de inverno (trigo na sucessão e tremoço na rotação); pós-aração de verão (dos tratamentos PC e Cr); pós-plantio de verão (soja na sucessão e milho na rotação); e na época de florescimento de verão. Em geral, não foi observada grande variabilidade em nenhum dos métodos, sendo o coeficiente de variação maior quanto menor o teor de CBM. Quando as coletas nas diferentes fases foram consideradas em conjunto, não houve diferença entre os métodos FE e FI em nenhum dos seis tratamentos estudados, bem como na análise conjunta de todos os tratamentos. Considerando todos os tratamentos, foi constatada correlação positiva significativa entre os métodos FE e FI, no entanto, na análise de cada tratamento, a significância ocorreu apenas para os tratamentos sob PD e PC em rotação ou sucessão de culturas, mas não para o uso do cruzador (Cr). Os resultados indicam que ambos os métodos podem ser utilizados para avaliar o CBM em condições semelhantes às do norte do Paraná, mas apontam a necessidade de se desenvolverem mais estudos comparativos entre os dois métodos nos solos brasileiros, em função de variações na quantidade e qualidade de matéria orgânica, assim como na intensidade de revolvimento do solo e incorporação de resíduos.
More and more studies, including in Brazil, have suggested the use of microbial biomass carbon (MBC) as a bioindicator of soil quality. Most studies employ two methods: the pioneer of fumigation-incubation (FI), in which the MBC is estimated based on CO2 emission from fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples after 10 days of incubation and fumigation-extraction (FE), in which MBC is estimated based on C extraction from fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples after 12 h. However, in Brazil the correlation between both methods has been evaluated in three ecosystems only: in the Amazon, the Cerrado and three soils of the State of Rio de Janeiro. In this paper the methods FE and FI were compared in a typical Dark Red Oxisol in the North of Paraná State. The analyses were performed in a 12 year-field trial in Londrina with six treatments, including three soil managements (no-tillage, NT; conventional tillage with traditional ploughing and disking, CT; and NT using a field cultivator every three years, FC) and two crop management types (crop rotation, CR; or multiple cropping, MC) systems. Four soil samples (0-10 cm) were taken: after winter harvest (wheat in CR and lupin in MC), after summer ploughing (for CT and FC treatments), after summer sowing (soybean in CR and maize in MC) and in the summer crop flowering stage. In general the variability was low by both methods and the coefficient of variation was higher, the lower the MBC values. No differences between the FE and FI methods were detected when the four samplings at different stages as well as when all treatments were considered together. When all treatments were analyzed together, the correlation between FE and FI was positive and statistically significant. However, when each treatment was considered separately significance was observed for the treatments NT and CT in CR and MC, but not for FC. Results indicate that both methods may be used to evaluate MBC under similar conditions in Northern Paraná, however, they also indicate that more studies should be performed in Brazilian soils comparing both methods as a function of qualitative and quantitative changes in the organic matter contents as well as in the incorporation of crop residues.
More and more studies, including in Brazil, have suggested the use of microbial biomass carbon (MBC) as a bioindicator of soil quality. Most studies employ two methods: the pioneer of fumigation-incubation (FI), in which the MBC is estimated based on CO2 emission from fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples after 10 days of incubation and fumigation-extraction (FE), in which MBC is estimated based on C extraction from fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples after 12 h. However, in Brazil the correlation between both methods has been evaluated in three ecosystems only: in the Amazon, the Cerrado and three soils of the State of Rio de Janeiro. In this paper the methods FE and FI were compared in a typical Dark Red Oxisol in the North of Paraná State. The analyses were performed in a 12 year-field trial in Londrina with six treatments, including three soil managements (no-tillage, NT; conventional tillage with traditional ploughing and disking, CT; and NT using a field cultivator every three years, FC) and two crop management types (crop rotation, CR; or multiple cropping, MC) systems. Four soil samples (0-10 cm) were taken: after winter harvest (wheat in CR and lupin in MC), after summer ploughing (for CT and FC treatments), after summer sowing (soybean in CR and maize in MC) and in the summer crop flowering stage. In general the variability was low by both methods and the coefficient of variation was higher, the lower the MBC values. No differences between the FE and FI methods were detected when the four samplings at different stages as well as when all treatments were considered together. When all treatments were analyzed together, the correlation between FE and FI was positive and statistically significant. However, when each treatment was considered separately significance was observed for the treatments NT and CT in CR and MC, but not for FC. Results indicate that both methods may be used to evaluate MBC under similar conditions in Northern Paraná, however, they also indicate that more studies should be performed in Brazilian soils comparing both methods as a function of qualitative and quantitative changes in the organic matter contents as well as in the incorporation of crop residues.
| Reference Key |
brando-junior2008revistacomparao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Osvaldino Brandão-Junior;Mariangela Hungria;Julio Cezar Franchini;Carlos Roberto Espindola |
| Journal | Revista de saude publica |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-06832008000500012
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Your session, form security (XSRF) and this choice; if you came through a member's referral link, its code for 30 days (referral_token). Journament's own cookies only.
Google Analytics 4 (Google LLC, USA): measures which pages are visited; the _ga and _ga_* cookies are kept for up to 2 years.
Google AdSense (Google LLC, USA): shows, measures and may personalise ads on journal, article and home pages; the __gads, __gpi and __eoi cookies are kept for up to 13 months.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.