design of concrete chimneys via beam theory and nonlinear shell analysis

Clicks: 88
ID: 249112
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #119 of 835 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 835 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper compares the load-bearing capacity of chimneys calculated via beam and shell theory. It becomes apparent that the design via beam theory is on the safe side for the vertical reinforcement of the chosen examples for h/d ratios larger than 30. For non-slender chimneys the design via beam theory overestimates the load distribution around the circumference and yields to wrong results. On the other hand a linear elastic shell calculation underestimates the load-bearing capacity of the chimney. However a realistic distribution of stresses in the cross section of a chimney can still be calculated using shell theory with nonlinear material properties.
Reference Key
wehr2016actadesign Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Franziska Wehr;Reinhard Harte
Journal BMC Bioinformatics
Year 2016
DOI
10.14311/APP.2017.7.0079
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.