acs in third decade of life – does it need different management guidelines? demographic, clinical and angiographic profile of very young (20–30 years) patients presenting as acs
Clicks: 119
ID: 248405
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
119 views
8 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #393 of 437 articles by views in renewable energy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 437 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
chhabra2017indianacs
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Shibba Takkar Chhabra;Tripat Kaur;Sarbjit Masson;Namita Bansal;Abhishek Goyal;Bhupinder Singh;Rohit Tandon;Naved Aslam;Bishav Mohan;Gurpreet Singh Wander |
| Journal | renewable energy |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.ihj.2017.09.076
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.