decisiones a la hora del cierre
Clicks: 70
ID: 247379
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
20.7
/100
70 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #185 of 256 articles by views in food science of animal resources
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 256 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Los periodistas necesitan seguir un proceso, para tomar decisiones éticas acertadas, cuando enfrentan varias alternativas difíciles en su trabajo diario. El caso de estudio sugerido en este artículo plantea el reconocimiento de ciertos principios que guían al periodista y desarrolla un proceso que podría ayudar a resolver eficientemente los dilemas. Reflexionar en torno a estudios de caso y hechos reales, permite aprender habilidades para tomar decisiones éticas que puedan ser explicativas y justificadas a un público escéptico.
| Reference Key |
potter-steele2015chasquidecisiones
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Deborah-Bob Potter-Steele |
| Journal | food science of animal resources |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.16921/chasqui.v0i61.1169
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.