keberlakuan uu no. 6 tahun 2014 tentang desa di bali dalam perspektif sosiologi hukum

Clicks: 120
ID: 247029
2016
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #52 of 79 articles by views in Health Communication

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The objective of research to determine the validity of Act No. 6 of 2014 in Bali. The research method used sosiolegal. The results showed there was a conflict between the norms of Article 6 of the explanation of the obligation to choose one type of village. During this time, the system of village administration is double the traditional village (pakraman) and village office (administration) in Bali. Sociologically, society, academics, community leaders, Perbekel and Bendesa declare that Article 6 was not suitable to be applied in Bali. Main Assembly Pakraman (MUDP) proposed Bali get an exception. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui keberlakuan UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 di Bali. Metode penelitian menggunakan sosiolegal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada konflik norma (conflict of norm) antara Pasal 6 dengan Penjelasannya tentang kewajiban memilih salah satu jenis desa. Selama ini, sistem pemerintahan desa bersifat ganda antara desa adat (pakraman) dan desa dinas (administrasi) di Bali. Secara sosiologis, masyarakat Bali, akademisi, tokoh masyarakat, Perbekel maupun Bendesa menyatakan Pasal 6 tidak cocok diterapkan di Bali. Majelis Utama Desa Pakraman (MUDP) mengusulkan supaya Bali mendapatkan pengecualian.
Reference Key
mulyanto2016mimbarkeberlakuan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;M Mulyanto
Journal Health Communication
Year 2016
DOI
10.22146/jmh.15880
URL
https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/15880
Keywords
jurisprudence comparative and uniform law

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.