thin-layer drying models for para rubber sheet
Clicks: 265
ID: 246581
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
265 views
27 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The purpose of this project was to study para rubber sheet drying at temperature of 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°, air velocity of 0.5 and 1 meter/second. The obtained experimental results were used to calculate moisture ratio values. Then the results obtained from 10 different types of thin layer drying models were compared with the experimental results. The experimental results of moisture ratio values of para rubber sheets indicated that at the same rate of air flow velocity but with different temperature, the higher the temperature, the faster velocity rate of the moisture evaporation of para rubber sheet. Whereas, with same temperature but at the different velocity rates of air flow, the higher the velocity rate of air flow, the faster the moisture evaporation of para rubber sheet. The comparative results of the 10 different types of thin layer drying models revealed that 5 models could predict the moisture ratio of para rubber sheet drying with a satisfactory level in all experimental conditions. The said 5 models were Modified Henderson and Pabis, Verma et al., Midilli et al., Weibull Distribution; and Page respectively with R2 ranges of 0.984 to 0.9995, adjusted R2 range of 0.9817 to 0.9993, SSE range of 0.0004162 to 0.01981 and RMSE range of 0.006451 to 0.03209. The best model that could predict moisture ratio in all experimental conditions was Modified Henderson and Pabis with R2 range of 0.9956 to 0.9992, adjusted R2range of 0.9943 to 0.9989, SSE range of 0.0008541 to 0.005914 and RMSE range of 0.007811 to 0.01786.
| Reference Key |
jeentada2014kkuthin-layer
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Wasan Jeentada;Pornprasit Kongboon;Sittiporn Boonyanuwat;Chalerm Sirirak |
| Journal | kku engineering journal |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.