comparative proteomic analysis of two barley cultivars (hordeum vulgare l.) with contrasting grain protein content

Clicks: 200
ID: 244786
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Grain protein contents of barley seeds are significantly different between feed and malting barley cultivars. However, there is still no insight into the proteomic analysis of seed proteins between feed and malting barley cultivars. Also, the genetic control of barley grain protein content is still unclear. Grain protein contents were measured between mature grains of Yangsimai 3 and Naso Nijo by using FOSS Kjeltec TM 2300. A proteome profiling of differentially expressed protein was established by using a combination of 2-DE, MALDI TOF MS and MS/MS. In total, 502 reproducible protein spots in barley seed proteome were detected with a pH range of 4-7 and 6-11, among these 41 protein spots (8.17%) were detected differentially expressed between Yangsimai 3 and Naso Nijo. Thirty-four protein spots corresponding to 23 different proteins were identified, which were grouped into eight categories, including stress, protein degradation and posttranslational modification, development, cell, signalling, glycolysis, starch metabolism and other functions. Among the identified proteins, enolase (spot 274) and small subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (spot 271) are exclusively expressed in barley Yangsimai 3, which may be involved in regulating seed protein expression. In addition, malting quality is characterized by an accumulation of serpin protein, Alpha-amylase/trypsin inhibitor CMb and Alpha-amylase inhibitor BDAI-1. Most noticeably, globulin, an important storage protein in barley seed, undergoes post-translational processing in both cultivars, and also displays different expression patterns.
Reference Key
exu2016frontierscomparative Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Rugen eXu;Baojian eGuo;Haiye eLuan;Shen eLin;Chao eLv;Xinzhong eZhang
Journal phytochemistry letters
Year 2016
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2016.00542
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.