a cost-utility analysis comparing omeprazole with ranitidine in the maintenance therapy of peptic esophageal stricture
Clicks: 200
ID: 244769
1998
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
200 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #65 of 250 articles by views in indian journal of pharmacology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 250 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that patients receiving omeprazole for prophylaxis against peptic esophageal stricture recurrence have less dysphagia and require fewer repeat dilations than patients receiving ranitidine.
| Reference Key |
stal1998canadiana
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jeffrey M Stal;James C Gregor;Harold G Preiksaitis;Richard PE Reynolds |
| Journal | indian journal of pharmacology |
| Year | 1998 |
| DOI |
10.1155/1998/947087
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.