translation and validation of the catastrophic cognitions questionnaire modified (ccq-m): a preliminary study in male subjects argentine

Clicks: 146
ID: 239144
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #57 of 62 articles by views in annals of internal medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In the absence of instrument to assess catastrophic cognitions in our local environment, the aim of this work is to make preliminary studies for the translation and adaptation of the Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire-Modified (Khawaja, Oei y Baglioni, 1994) to assess psychometric properties in males aged 45 to 75 years old. A principal components analysis with Oblimin rotation resulted in 13 items grouped in three dimensions: Emotional, Physical and Mental, which explained a total variance of 62%. To evaluate the reliability of the scores, these were calculated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient resulting in values of a = .82 for the Emotional Factor, a = .77 Physical Factor and a = .82 for the Mental Factor, which indicated adequate internal consistency. It will continue with further studies in other and more heterogeneous samples to confirm these results.
Reference Key
iris2014revistatranslation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Pereyra Girardi, Carolina Iris;Ofman, Silvia Deborah;Cófreces, Pedro;Stefani, Dorina
Journal annals of internal medicine
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/5930
Keywords
validation anxiety psychology religionpsychology

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.