which deceives us more, memories or documents? experiences of freinet’s pedagogy in the rural school in the 1970s
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #45 of 60 articles by views in Psychological medicine
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
Analyzing classroom practices applied in the 1970s requires the researcher to combine the use of oral and written sources. However, it is not always possible to examine in a systematic way the contribution of each one of them to the investigation. Taking advantage of the existence of both types of sources related to the educative work of the militants of Freinet’s movement, in this article I will try to compare the historical reconstruction based on memories with conclusions founded on the analysis of documents. This comparison is carried out in a very constricted and controllable social context – a couple of rural schools – that allows one to observe in a very clear way how both the memories and the documents can distort or illuminate the phenomenon which interests us: the consequences of the usage of Freint’s pedagogy in the rural school in Salamanca.
| Reference Key |
groves2010forowhich
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Tamar Groves |
| Journal | Psychological medicine |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.