Relationships as the Backbone of Feedback: Exploring Preceptor and Resident Perceptions of Their Behaviors During Feedback Conversations.
Clicks: 263
ID: 23870
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
77.3
/100
263 views
213 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #32 of 146 articles by views in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 146 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Newer definitions of feedback emphasize learner engagement throughout the conversation, yet teacher and learner perceptions of each other's behaviors during feedback exchanges have been less well studied. This study explored perceptions of residents and faculty regarding effective behaviors and strategies during feedback conversations and factors that affected provision and acceptance of constructive feedback.Six outpatient internal medicine preceptors and 12 residents at Brigham and Women's Hospital participated (2 dyads per preceptor) between September 2017 and May 2018. Their scheduled feedback conversations were observed by the lead investigator, and one-on-one interviews were conducted with each member of the dyad to explore their perceptions of the conversation. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for key themes. Because participants repeatedly emphasized teacher-learner relationships as key to meaningful feedback, a framework method of analysis was performed using the 3-step relationship-centered communication model REDE (relationship establishment, development, and engagement).After participant narratives were mapped onto the REDE model, key themes were identified and categorized under the major steps of the model. First, establishment: revisit and renew established relationships, preparation allows deeper reflection on goals, set a collaborative agenda. Second, development: provide a safe space to invite self-reflection, make it about a skill or action. Third, engagement: enhance self-efficacy at the close, establish action plans for growth.Feedback conversations between longitudinal teacher-learner dyads could be mapped onto a relationship-centered communication framework. Our study suggests that behaviors that enable trusting and supportive teacher-learner relationships can form the foundation of meaningful feedback.
| Reference Key |
ramani2019relationshipsacademic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ramani, Subha;Könings, Karen D;Ginsburg, Shiphra;van der Vleuten, Cees P M; |
| Journal | Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1097/ACM.0000000000002971
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.