rozdiely v sebahodnotení študentov v európskej dimenzii
Clicks: 4
ID: 238587
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.9
/100
4 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #39 of 40 articles by views in results in physics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Naša práca je teoreticko výskumného typu. V teoretickej časti sme sa zamerali na sebahodnotenie, zadefinovali sme sebahodnotenie ako také, hlavné aspekty sebahodnotenia a jeho vzniku. Pozornosť sme zamerali na Rosenbergovu škálu sebahodnotenia a výskum D. Schmitta. Vo výskumnej časti sme sa pokúsili zistiť súčasný stav vybraných Európskych krajín v miere sebahodnotenia.
| Reference Key |
tomik2014paidagogosrozdiely
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Robert Tomšik |
| Journal | results in physics |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.