rozdiely v sebahodnotení študentov v európskej dimenzii

Clicks: 30
ID: 238587
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #38 of 40 articles by views in results in physics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Naša práca je teoreticko výskumného typu. V teoretickej časti sme sa zamerali na sebahodnotenie, zadefinovali sme sebahodnotenie ako také, hlavné aspekty sebahodnotenia a jeho vzniku. Pozornosť sme zamerali na Rosenbergovu škálu sebahodnotenia a výskum D. Schmitta. Vo výskumnej časti sme sa pokúsili zistiť súčasný stav vybraných Európskych krajín v miere sebahodnotenia.
Reference Key
tomik2014paidagogosrozdiely Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal results in physics
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.