the methodological paths for the study of sanitary surveillance

Clicks: 400
ID: 238291
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #9 of 130 articles by views in food research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 130 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: The aim is to assess the appropriateness of using quantitative and qualitative approaches to analyzing and understanding the sanitary surveillance object in its relation to epidemiology. Data Synthesis: After a brief background on the relationship between epidemiology and social sciences, and between quantitative and qualitative methods, the study analyzes characteristics of the sanitary surveillance object that may assist the understanding of its nature and, therefore, of the most appropriate methodological approaches to its analysis. The characteristics identified here – namely, complexity of health/disease process, concept of risk, performance in promotion and protection levels, sanitary surveillance management model, availability of information, and relationship with epidemiology – express quantitative and qualitative aspects of equal importance to the knowledge of this issue. Conclusion: The combination or interaction of quantitative and qualitative approaches can be considered, in the case of sanitary surveillance, as a vital requisite for the apprehension of this object in its entirety.
Reference Key
lucena2013revistathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Regina Célia Borges de Lucena
Journal food research
Year 2013
DOI
10.5020/18061230.2013.p146
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.