influence of probe geometry on measurement results of non-ideal thermal conductivity sensors
Clicks: 167
ID: 238107
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
167 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #25 of 35 articles by views in radiologic technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The thermal properties of the surface and subsurface layers of planets and
planetary objects yield important information that allows us to better
understand the thermal evolution of the body itself and its interactions with
the environment. Various planetary bodies of our Solar System are covered by
so-called regolith, a granular and porous material. On such planetary bodies
the dominant heat transfer mechanism is heat conduction via IR radiation and
contact points between particles. In this case the energy balance is mainly
controlled by the effective thermal conductivity of the top surface layers,
which can be directly measured by thermal conductivity probes. A
traditionally used method for measuring the thermal conductivity of solid
materials is the needle-probe method. Such probes consist of thin steel
needles with an embedded heating wire and temperature sensors. For the
evaluation of the thermal conductivity of a specific material the temperature
change with time is determined by heating a resistance wire with a
well-defined electrical current flowing through it and simultaneously
measuring the temperature increase inside the probe over a certain time. For
thin needle probes with a large length-to-diameter ratio it is mathematically
easy to derive the thermal conductivity, while this is not so straightforward
for more rugged probes with a larger diameter and thus a smaller
length-to-diameter ratio. Due to the geometry of the standard thin needle
probes they are mechanically weak and subject to bending when driven into a
soil. Therefore, using them for planetary missions can be problematic.
In this paper the thermal conductivity values determined by measurements with two non-ideal, ruggedized thermal conductivity sensors, which only differ in length, are compared to each other. Since the theory describing the temperature response of non-ideal sensors is highly complicated, those sensors were calibrated with an ideal reference sensor in various solid and granular materials. The calibration procedure and the results are described in this work.
In this paper the thermal conductivity values determined by measurements with two non-ideal, ruggedized thermal conductivity sensors, which only differ in length, are compared to each other. Since the theory describing the temperature response of non-ideal sensors is highly complicated, those sensors were calibrated with an ideal reference sensor in various solid and granular materials. The calibration procedure and the results are described in this work.
| Reference Key |
tiefenbacher2016geoscientificinfluence
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;P. Tiefenbacher;N. I. Kömle;W. Macher;G. Kargl |
| Journal | radiologic technology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.5194/gi-5-383-2016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.