análise ultraestrutural e de fatores de crescimento de diferentes métodos de preservação da membrana amniótica utilizada em cirurgia ocular ultrastructural and growth factor analysis of amniotic membrane preserved by different methods for ocular surger

Clicks: 352
ID: 236830
2007
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #33 of 137 articles by views in introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 137 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Comparar, por microscopia eletrônica, a integridade anatômica e a presença de fatores de crescimento e citocinas da membrana amniótica preservada com glicerol/MEM (1:1) e dimetilsulfóxido puro. MÉTODOS: As membranas amnióticas preservadas em glicerol/MEM (1:1) ou dimetilsulfóxido puro foram processadas para microscopia eletrônica de transmissão e varredura. Como controle, membrana amniótica fresca foi imediatamente fixada após coleta e processada para microscopia eletrônica. As citocinas e os fatores de crescimento avaliados foram: TGF-beta- fator transformador de crescimento beta; TGF-beta ativ- fator transformador de crescimento beta ativado; EGF- fator recombinante de crescimento epitelial humano; FGF-4- fator de crescimento fibroblástico 4; FGF-beta- fator de crescimento fibroblástico básico; IL-4- interleucina 4; PGE2- prostaglandina E2; IL-10- interleucina 10; KGF- fator de crescimento de queratinócito; HGF- fator de crescimento de hepatócito. RESULTADOS: As membranas amnióticas do grupo controle apresentavam epitélio íntegro, com microvilos na superfície e complexos juncionais entre as células e a membrana basal. As membranas amnióticas preservadas em glicerol/MEM tinham aspecto semelhante às do controle, com maior altura das células epiteliais. Já as membranas amnióticas preservadas em dimetilsulfóxido mostraram redução das junções intercelulares e destacamento do epitélio da membrana basal. As citocinas e fatores de crescimento não apresentaram diferenças entre os grupos, exceto FGF-4, FGF-beta, PGE2 e KGF. CONCLUSÕES: A membrana amniótica preservada em meio glicerol/MEM apresentou melhor integridade tecidual, com menor desprendimento do epitélio da membrana basal, em comparação com a preservada no dimetilsulfóxido puro. Os fatores de crescimento e citocinas estavam, em sua maior parte, preservados com as duas técnicas de preservação.
PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical structure and the presence of growth factors and cytokines of amniotic membrane preserved in glycerol/MEM (1:1) or undiluted dimethyl sulfoxide through electron microscopy. METHODS: Amniotic membrane preserved in glycerol/MEM (1:1) or undiluted dimethyl sulfoxide were processed for transmission and scaning electron microscopy. As control, freshly collected amniotic membrane was fixed and processed for electron microscopy. The cytokines and growth factors assessed were: TGF-beta (transforming growth factor beta); TGF-b activ (activated transforming growth factor beta); EGF (epidermal growth factor); FGF-4 (fibroblast growth factor 4); bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor); IL-4 (interleukin 4); PGE2 (prostaglandin E2); IL-10 (interleukin 10); KGF (keratinocyte growth factor); HGF (hepatocyte growth factor). RESULTS: Amniotic membrane from the control group showed intact epithelium, with surface microvilli and junctional complexes between the cells and the basal membrane. Glycerol/MEM preserved amniotic membrane had similar aspect to the control, with higher epithelial cells. Those amniotic membranes preserved in dimethyl sulfoxide disclosed less intercellular junction and detachment of the epithelium from the basal membrane. The cytokines and growth factors did not disclose significant differences, except for FGF-4, bFGF, PGE2 and KGF. CONCLUSIONS: Amniotic membrane preserved in glycerol/MEM showed a better tissue structure, with less detachment of the epithelium from the basal membrane, in comparison to undiluted dimethyl sulfoxide. The majority of the growth factors and cytokines were kept with both techniques of preservation.
Reference Key
pena2007arquivosanlise Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Janethe Deolinda de Oliveira Pena;Gustavo Barreto de Melo;José Álvaro Pereira Gomes;Edna Freymuller Haapalainen;Ciro Massayuki Komagome;Namir Clementino Santos;Acácio Alves de Souza Lima Filho;Luiz Vicente Rizzo
Journal introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack
Year 2007
DOI
10.1590/S0004-27492007000500006
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492007000500006
Keywords
microscopy glycerol cytokines dimethyl sulfoxide electron citocina transforming growth factor betaophthalmology

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.