contribuiÇÕes da anÁlise do discurso e da epistemologia de fleck para a compreensÃo da divulgaÇÃo cientÍfica e sua introduÇÃo em aulas de ciÊncias
Clicks: 111
ID: 236557
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
111 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #20 of 41 articles by views in urologia
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this article, the popular science is seen as production of an "esoteric" circle constituted by scientists and journalists and comprehended in terms of intercollective communication of ideas, i. e., by the exchange of information that occurs between the "esoteric" circle and the "exoteric" circle of non specialists. I try to characterize the conditions of production of the popular scientific text using categories of Discourse Analysis and Fleck¿s epistemology. I also argue the implications of the mediations that occur when the popular scientific text is produced and introduced in science classroom later. Finally, I discuss the possibility that those mediations might constitute obstacles for the formal scientific concepts learning. In order to accomplish it, the relations between the context of production and meaning making of popular scientific text are considered in the reading process.
| Reference Key |
nascimento2005ensaiocontribuies
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Tatiana Galieta Nascimento |
| Journal | urologia |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.