lack of agreement on fragmentation metrics blurs correspondence between fragmentation experiments and predicted effects
Clicks: 152
ID: 236357
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
151 views
7 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The direct correspondence between landscape fragmentation and its effects is still the subject of debate. Many widely accepted hypotheses are not supported by experiments. The issue of fragmentation measurement is addressed here. To predict the effects of fragmentation, it is essential to quantify the pattern of fragmentation. Despite the increased use of spatial analysis and available measures, experts have not yet reached an agreement on how to measure patterns of fragmented landscapes and, thus, unambiguous translation of experimental findings into conservation or management guidelines is hampered.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (86 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
bogaert2003ecologylack
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jan Bogaert |
| Journal | ieee access |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
10.5751/ES-00495-0701r06
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.