método de análise de maturidade e priorização de melhorias na gestão do processo de desenvolvimento de produtos a method for maturity measurement and ranking of improvement projects in product development management
Clicks: 144
ID: 235638
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
144 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #40 of 61 articles by views in Neotropical entomology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O Processo de Desenvolvimento de Produtos (PDP) é um procedimento de negócio cada vez mais decisivo nos resultados estratégicos das empresas que dele dependem. A tarefa de identificar oportunidades de melhoria na gestão deste processo complexo não é trivial e tem incentivado vários pesquisadores a propor abordagens para tornar mais racional o esforço de sofisticação da gestão do PDP (GPDP). Este artigo tem por objetivo apresentar um método gerencial aplicável ao diagnóstico da maturidade da GPDP e priorização de melhorias neste procedimento. O diagnóstico da maturidade proposto é realizado através do relacionamento entre a frequência da ocorrência de problemas típicos do PDP e dez áreas do conhecimento da GPDP. A partir deste relacionamento são identificadas as áreas de gestão em estado crítico e que merecem atenção gerencial. Estas áreas são desdobradas em melhores práticas, que se afiguram como oportunidades de melhoria, as quais são priorizadas utilizando-se uma matriz MAUT (Multiattribute Utility). O método foi aplicado em uma empresa de desenvolvimento de software, na forma de estudo de caso, e se mostrou adequado.
The Product Development Process (PDP) has increasing influence on companies' strategic results. Eliciting improvement opportunities in PDP is a non-trivial task, and has motivated researchers to propose approaches to rationalize the effort of sophisticating PDP Management (PDPM). This paper presents a method to measure the maturity of the PDPM and to prioritize improvement projects in that area. The maturity measurement is performed by quantifying relationships between the PDPM's knowledge areas and typical problems present in PDP. To rank improvement opportunities, critical knowledge areas are deployed into Best Practices, to which improvement opportunities are related and prioritized using a Multi-attribute Utility method. The proposed method is illustrated in a case study centered on a software development industry.
The Product Development Process (PDP) has increasing influence on companies' strategic results. Eliciting improvement opportunities in PDP is a non-trivial task, and has motivated researchers to propose approaches to rationalize the effort of sophisticating PDP Management (PDPM). This paper presents a method to measure the maturity of the PDPM and to prioritize improvement projects in that area. The maturity measurement is performed by quantifying relationships between the PDPM's knowledge areas and typical problems present in PDP. To rank improvement opportunities, critical knowledge areas are deployed into Best Practices, to which improvement opportunities are related and prioritized using a Multi-attribute Utility method. The proposed method is illustrated in a case study centered on a software development industry.
| Reference Key |
jnior2010productionmtodo
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Alberto Cristofari Júnior;Istefani Carísio de Paula;Flávio Sanson Fogliatto |
| Journal | Neotropical entomology |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.