precision and recall ratios in evaluating the quality of literature searches
Clicks: 146
ID: 233720
1994
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
146 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #114 of 417 articles by views in International journal of food microbiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 417 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Critera by which literature search services may be evaluated, are quality, time and cost criteria. Evaluation judgements are far from being reliable, if not based on these criteria. Relevance, which is the most important quality criteria, is discussed briefly. Precision and Recall ratios, which reflect the numerical value and measure of Relevance, are discussed in some detail. These two criteria frequently used to judge the performance of searches. Significance of Precision and Recall is described and definitions are given. It is considered that these two ratios are the most important performance criteria among all, for they measure Relevance, and Relevance is the most significant component in search effectiveness. For this reason, the present study is limited mainly to the topics of Precision and Recall. However, the text includes some brief description of other criteria as well. In the present study, it is stated as a conclusion that Precision and Recall ratios should be used as Relevancy criteria in judging the performance of literature searches, otherwise all the quality judgements on searches will be false and unreliable.
| Reference Key |
alkan1994trkprecision
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nazlı Alkan |
| Journal | International journal of food microbiology |
| Year | 1994 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.