procedural aspects of the organization of the comprehensive european board of ophthalmology diploma examination

Clicks: 200
ID: 232883
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #33 of 42 articles by views in inorganic chemistry communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) examination is one of 38 European medical specialty examinations. This review aims at disclosing the specific procedures and content of the EBOD examination. It is a descriptive study summarizing the present organization of the EBOD examination. It is the 3rd largest European postgraduate medical assessment after anaesthesiology and cardiology. The master language is English for the Part 1 written test (knowledge test with 52 modified type X multiple-choice questions) (in the past the written test was also available in French and German). Ophthalmology training of minimum 4 years in a full or associated European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) member state is a prerequisite. Problem-solving skills are tested in the Part 2 oral assessment, which is a viva of 4 subjects conducted in English with support for native language whenever feasible. The comprehensive EBOD examination is one of the leading examinations organized by UEMS European Boards or Specialist Sections from the point of number of examinees, item banking, and item contents.
Reference Key
mathysen2016journalprocedural Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Danny G.P. Mathysen;Peter J. Ringens;Edoardo Midena;Artur Klett;Gordana Sunaric-Mégevand;Rafael Martinez-Costa;Denise Curtin;Marie-José Tassignon;Wagih Aclimandos;Catherine Creuzot-Garcher;Christina Grupcheva
Journal inorganic chemistry communications
Year 2016
DOI
10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.27
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.