anticoagulant therapy in everyday clinical practice: data of the retrospective cross-sectional study

Clicks: 229
ID: 232604
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #44 of 98 articles by views in environmental technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Aim. To study the structure and incidence of the in-hospital anticoagulants prescription in patients at high risk of thromboembolic events (TEE) and to evaluate clinical characteristics of anticoagulated patients (by the example of the University Clinical Hospital (UCH) №1 of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (FMSMU).

Material and methods. The cross-sectional retrospective study held in UCH №1 of the FMSMU, enrolled 677 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for whom the prevention of TEE was indicated.

Results. Of 677 analyzed cases (women 70%, men 30%) only 61% of the patients received appropriate anticoagulant therapy. Warfarin was prescribed in 73% of the cases, of them unsatisfactory international normalized ratio (INR) control (time in therapeutic range less than 60%) was revealed in 79%. 8.45% of the vitamin K antagonist treated patients developed hemorrhagic complications. 16% of the patients received novel oral anticoagulants (dabigatran – 14%, rivaroxaban – 2%). Bleeding was fixed in 4.2% of the dabigatran treated patients and in 14.3% - in case of rivaroxaban therapy.

Conclusion. More than a third of non-valvular AF patients receive inadequate antithrombotic therapy in routine clinical practice. 75% of the anticoagulated patients are prescribed the vitamin K antagonists (typically warfarin) as a traditional anticoagulant. At that, only in 21.7% of the patients receiving vitamin K antagonists, this therapy may be considered adequate. Low incidence rate of the novel oral anticoagulants prescription despite the advantages of such treatment also calls attention.

Reference Key
sulimov2015racionalnaanticoagulant Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;V. A. Sulimov;D. A. Napalkov;A. A. Sokolova;A. V. Jilenko;O. S. Anikina
Journal environmental technology
Year 2015
DOI
10.1234/1819-6446-2015-2-116-123
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.