guía de periodismo científico
Clicks: 12
ID: 231198
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
3.3
/100
12 views
7 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #215 of 256 articles by views in food science of animal resources
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 256 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
La finalidad esencial de un artículo científico es comunicar ideas e informaciones de una manera clara, concisa y fidedigna. Los autores y los jefes de redacción deben tratar sobre todo de lograr ese objetivo. La mayoría de las recomendaciones particulares formuladas en la presente Guía están concebidas en ese sentido. Debido principalmente al número cada vez mayor de publicaciones científicas, es necesario establecer normas aplicables a las revistas científicas, para facilitar el intercambio entre los hombres de ciencia de todos los países.
| Reference Key |
chasqui2015chasquigua
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Revista Chasqui |
| Journal | food science of animal resources |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.