ethical and legal aspects of the fertilization in vitro: case artavia murillo vs. costa rica

Clicks: 165
ID: 229162
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #12 of 16 articles by views in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper analyzes the Case Fertilization in vitro vs. Costa Rica, judged by the Inter- American Court of Human Rights, from the perspective of bioethics and law. For this, the theories about the beginnings of life were discussed, as the theoretical debate of the Kantian imperative and the Beck's risk society, in order to provide the discussion on human dignity and risks of research in biotechnology and genetics. For the IACHR,to prohibit fertilization in vitro in Costa Rica was discriminatory and violated theduty of not arbitrary interference in private life and the right of family’s formation.
Reference Key
vilela2016revistaethical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Helena Cristina Aguiar De Paula Vilela;Maria Cristina Paiva Santiago
Journal Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Year 2016
DOI
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2016.v2i1.279
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.