validity and reliability of agoraphobic cognitions questionnaire-turkish version
Clicks: 248
ID: 228952
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
248 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #14 of 20 articles by views in algorithmica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire
-Turkish Version (ACQ).
Method: ACQ was administered to 92 patients with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia. BSQ Turkish
version completed by translation, back-translation and pilot assessment. Reliability of ACQ was analyzed by test-retest
correlation, split-half technique, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis after
the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett test had been performed. Principal component analysis and varimax rotation
used for factor analysis.
Results: 64% of patients evaluated in the study were female and 36% were male. Age interval was between 18 and 58,
mean age was 31.5±10.4. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.91. Analysis of test-retest evaluations revealed that
there were statistically significant correlations ranging between 24% and 84% concerning questionnaire components.
In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of half questionnaires were found as 0.77 and 0.91.
Again Spearmen-Brown coefficient was found as 0.87 by the same analysis. To assess construct validity of ACQ, factor
analysis was performed and two basic factors found. These two factors explained 57.6% of the total variance. (Factor 1:
34.6%, Factor 2: 23%)
Conclusion: Our findings support that ACQ-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity
| Reference Key |
kart2013biliselvalidity
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ayşegül KART;M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR |
| Journal | algorithmica |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.