acknowledgement to reviewers of insects in 2015

Clicks: 168
ID: 228868
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #119 of 127 articles by views in conference proceedings : annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society ieee engineering in medicine and biology society annual conference

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 127 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The editors of Insects would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2015. [...]
Reference Key
office2016insectsacknowledgement Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Insects Editorial Office
Journal conference proceedings : annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society ieee engineering in medicine and biology society annual conference
Year 2016
DOI
10.3390/insects7010003
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.